Attention Whoring

Self Obsession (pt. 1)

In an attempt to prove even more self-obsessed than I have proven before I will be reviewing myself. That is to say: I will be spending the next bunch of entries reviewing sketches that I have recently uploaded onto youtube from my old college sketch comedy troupe. In an attempt to appear less self-obsessed than I have proven to be, I will be joined in this effort by Rhett and Lara (and possibly Ben via comments). Jesus, this is gonna be fun.

Today’s sketch: Castrato in the City

Grade: B

Ok, so I love any sketch that comments on sitcom-style and I think this sketch does this wonderfully. It illustrates beautifully that sitcoms are, in essence, just an excuse to make one weird quirk into the premise of a life. The puns are just clever enough to be funny, but not too clever so that it still fits the sitcom aesthetic correctly. The characters are all perfect archetypes from the mean old authority figure to the sexual platonic roomie to the mean side character that won’t be another episode. Where this sketch falls flat is in structure. Because it is attempting to be a parody of something that is typically filmed, the stage production of it proves difficult. The scene changes take too long, the character introduction montage seems awkward, and the characters (aside from Billy and Tina) aren’t truly introduced.

That being said, the characters are all really interesting, which is important. Cardinal Marcioni is the only character that didn’t have some weird quirk, which I think would have really helped (Possibly the puns made him laugh or he was really buddy-buddy with Billy). Glickstein’s depiction of the creepy bar man was a hysterical absurd take on the typical creepo in sitcoms, and was perfectly placed since the audience had already gotten comfortable with conceit that this was a sitcom. Once okay with that conceit we are given these two bizarre over-interpretations of the creepster and the over-protective boyfriend. Though the physical fight between Paul and Ben was awkward and obviously under-rehearsed, the arguing between them was hilarious in its nonsensicality. Though the words themselves didn’t really make sense, the tone and placement of the fight meant the audience knew exactly what exchange was going on, which gets to the heart of the issue of the sketch – sitcoms are formulaic.

Overall, I love the idea but there were huge holes in the delivery because of a lack of attention to detail. Probably would have been better as a filmed endeavour.

Best Actor: My voice (especially during the ticker tape trash line). Best Line: “C’mon… Candy. Pie. … You know you wanna take a ride on the wild side.”

Next Entry: Consent Doesn’t Come in the Form of Silence


2 thoughts on “Self Obsession (pt. 1)

  1. Ben says:

    A note on my methodology

    1) As of now I have withdrawn from the blogoshpere with the exception of commenting on other blogs. Thus, my reviews will be posted as responses to Nisse’s, or perhaps Lara or Rhett’s blogs.

    2) I will follow Nisse’s A-F grading system, in as far as I understand Nisse’s intent for that system. It seems Nisse is rating the performance of the sketch itself. I will do likewise. I will also include a number grade, which will represent my assessment of the actual thing we are reviewing: Nisse’s poorly cut, text-watermarked, youtube videos, Emma’s-boobs-ogling camerawork and all (who WAS that?) I figure that if these are to exist indefinitely on youtube, some comment should be made on whether myself or anyone else should watch them. If so, how many times? I’ve watched “Power Thirst” roughly 45 times, making it a true youtube success. I will offer a number based on how many times I recommend watching each of these clips.

    Castrato In The City:

    Grade: B
    Given that introduction, I don’t have too much to say about this one. Its a funny sketch, with good lines and decent execution. I think that Paul and I could have hammed up our characters even more, and I think that Cora gets an award for making her straight-woman entertaining to watch.

    Watchability: 2
    I’d watch it twice. I’d watch any Bad Comedy video once for nostalgia’s sake. I figure there are people out there who will like to watch this a second time, perhaps if they are really drunk like the audience, or to catch exactly what foods Nisse is singing about at Chicho’s, or if they are Lara. This is no youtube phenomenon.

  2. Pingback: In Which I Review Myself, Sort of « Sundry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s